Jennifer Lawrence Reveals Why She Declined an Intimacy Coordinator on Latest Project Her Upcoming Movie
Jennifer Lawrence has joined the increasing number of actors who voice skepticism about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, explaining she chose not to use their services while working on her new movie Die My Love.
Understanding the Purpose of On-Set Intimacy Professionals
Intimacy coordinators emerged following the #MeToo movement to ensure the security and ease of actors during sequences involving nudity and intimate moments. Yet, several well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with some suggesting they disrupt artistic process.
Jennifer's On-Set Perspective
Speaking during the popular culture podcast, while discussing her latest project where she portrays a woman experiencing mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We chose not to use such a professional, or perhaps we had the option but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Robert."
She continued: "He is completely professional and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations primarily focused on our children and personal connections. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or questions about personal boundaries."
"Had there been the slightest indication of unease, I definitely would have insisted on an on-set professional. Numerous male actors get upset if you don't reciprocate their attention, and then the retaliation starts. He was completely different."
Professional Validation and Ongoing Debate
Recently, industry platform IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a distinct credit, alongside multiple additional crew positions including dance direction, craft services, and puppet operation. Before this, they were categorized as "additional crew" instead of having their own designation.
Despite this recognition, these professionals still encounter media scrutiny suggesting they might not be required standards, with well-known performers declining their participation. Jennifer's viewpoint mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier revealed she declined intimacy coordination while filming alongside her co-star on The Morning Show.
Aniston's Experience
"He proved to be such a gentleman – I mean each action, every cut, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "It was additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, suitable lighting. So, you don't prepare."
She added, "Production suggested, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Please, this is awkward enough!' We're experienced professionals – we can manage appropriately. And we had our director on set."
Other Examples and Professional Response
Despite featuring multiple sequences of sexual activity and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning project about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – proceeded without an intimacy coordinator.
The film's star explained she and co-star her screen partner "decided it would be preferable to maintain privacy."
"My character is a sex worker, and I had studied the director's work and recognized his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as professional work."
These statements provoked strong reactions from industry professionals, mirroring the reaction to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who recently revealed that filming her forthcoming project her latest film marked her first encounter with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."
Paltrow's Perspective
During filming about comfort level with a particular action alongside co-star Timothée Chalamet, the actress responded: "I'm from the generation where you remove clothing, you assume position, the camera's on."
Paltrow added that she and her co-star then told the coordinator: "We believe we're comfortable. You can maintain distance.' I can't speak to how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, extremely restricted by that."
Industry Response
Following these comments, industry executive Caroline Hollick described them as "concerning" and pointed out that most of those opposing these professionals have established careers to command their own power and protection on production locations.
"Occasionally an actor shares opinions about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "The actress stated she came of age in a time when people in Hollywood 'removed clothing and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood working with a actor considerably junior than her, while I'm sure he is chill, I found it quite an irresponsible remark."
Actor's Viewpoint
Michael Douglas, meanwhile, expressed that he feels the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male performer, rather than a third party.
"Based on my career, you take responsibility as the male actor to ensure the female co-star is at ease, you discuss it thoroughly," he explained. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's extremely careful but seems like it's happening naturally, which is hopefully what convincing acting appears as."